FREE CONSULTATION
Speak to a Principal Lawyer
Charged with Assaulting a Police Officer? What You Need to Know
Being charged with assaulting a police officer in Burwood is one of the most serious criminal matters under NSW criminal law. Section 60 of the Crimes Act 1900 (NSW) creates a graduated set of offences, ranging from intimidation without injury (5 years maximum) through to wounding or causing grievous bodily harm to an officer during a public disorder (14 years maximum).
What many people do not realise is that the central element of the allegation is whether the member of law enforcement was acting “in the execution of their duty”. Where an arrest was unlawful, where excessive force was used by police, or where the officer’s actions fell outside their lawful authority, the prosecution case can collapse entirely.
This is where a strong defense strategy becomes critical, particularly when analysing the difference between lawful and unlawful police conduct.
Outcomes vary widely. Many matters of this kind are downgraded, defended successfully, or resolved with non-conviction outcomes.
The Australian Legal Practice represents clients facing serious criminal allegations across Burwood, Sydney CBD, and Parramatta. Our principal lawyers are available 24/7, the first consultation is free, and we have strong experience in challenging “execution of duty” elements.
Contact (02) 8084 9929 for an initial consultation with a principal criminal defence solicitor.
What Is Assaulting a Police Officer?
This offence category is a specific aggravated assault offence under section 60 of the Crimes Act 1900 (NSW). The conduct caught by the section is broader than physical assault and includes:
- Assault in the ordinary criminal law sense (use or threat of unlawful force)
- Throwing a missile at the individual
- Stalking, harassing, or intimidating a member of law enforcement
The matter has two key features that make it more serious than common assault:
- The individual involved must be acting “in the execution of their duty” at the time of the conduct. This is the element prosecution must prove and the most common ground for challenge.
- The penalties are significantly higher than for ordinary common assault. Conduct that would be 2 years maximum if directed at a member of the public can attract up to 5 years where the victim is a police officer or public servant.
The provision also captures retaliatory conduct. Under section 60, an act is considered to be “against a police officer” even where the said person is off-duty, if the conduct is committed because of his previous execution of duty.
A related but distinct offense under section 60A applies to law enforcement individuals other than police, such as correctional officers, sheriff’s officers, and similar roles. Section 58 creates a separate offence of “assault with intent to commit a serious indictable offence” against police and certain other officers, carrying up to 5 years.
Assaulting a Police Officer Under Australian Law
While these allegations are governed by NSW law, similar charges may be treated as a felony-level offense under certain international or federal-style legal systems, highlighting the seriousness of the conduct.
Section | Conduct | Maximum Penalty |
s 60(1) | Assault, throw missile, stalk, harass, or intimidate (no ABH) | 5 years imprisonment |
s 60(1A) | Same conduct during a public disorder | 7 years imprisonment |
s 60(2) | Assault occasioning actual bodily harm | 7 years imprisonment (SNPP 3 years) |
s 60(2A) | ABH during a public disorder | 9 years imprisonment |
s 60(3) | Wounding or causing grievous bodily harm (reckless) | 12 years imprisonment |
s 60(3A) | Wounding or GBH during a public disorder | 14 years imprisonment |
A “public disorder” is defined in the Act and is generally connected to riots or large-scale public disturbances. Most assault police charges do not involve a public disorder element.
The s 60(1) and s 60(2) offences are Table 1 offences and are generally finalised in the Local Court unless the prosecution or accused elects to have the matter heard in the District Court. Wounding or GBH offences under s 60(3) and s 60(3A) are strictly indictable and must be committed to the District Court.
What Must the Prosecution Prove?
To secure a conviction, the prosecution must prove each element beyond a reasonable doubt. If any element fails, the court must find you not guilty. This is where experienced solicitors can make a significant impact in building a strong defense.
For the standard allegation under section 60(1), the prosecution must prove:
- You assaulted, threw a missile at, stalked, harassed, or intimidated another person
- That person was a member of law enforcement
- The individual was acting in the execution of their duty at the time of the conduct (or the conduct was committed in retaliation for a previous execution of duty)
- You acted intentionally or recklessly
For the more serious allegations, the prosecution must additionally prove:
- Actual bodily harm under s 60(2) and s 60(2A): an injury more than “merely transient or trifling” (per R v Donovan [1934] 2 KB 498), including bruises, scratches, swelling, or recognised psychiatric injury
- Wounding or grievous bodily harm under s 60(3) and s 60(3A): a breaking of both layers of skin (wounding) or a really serious injury (GBH)
- Public disorder under s 60(1A), (2A), and (3A): the conduct occurred during a defined public disorder, such as a riot
The “execution of duty” element is critical. If the member involved was acting outside their lawful authority — for example, conducting an unlawful arrest, using excessive force, or entering premises without lawful authority — then the conduct may not be in the execution of their duty, and the charge may not be made out.
Penalties for Assaulting a Police Officer in NSW
Sentencing for these matters ranges widely based on the specific charge, the conduct involved, and personal circumstances.
Charge | Local Court Max | District Court Max | Standard Non-Parole |
Assault police no ABH (s 60(1)) | 2 years | 5 years | None |
ABH on police (s 60(2)) | 2 years | 7 years | 3 years |
Reckless wounding/GBH on police (s 60(3)) | Indictable only | 12 years | None published |
Public disorder offences (s 60(1A), (2A), (3A)) | Various | 7 to 14 years | Higher tariff |
Sentencing options available to the court:
- Section 10 dismissal (no conviction recorded)
- Conditional Release Order (CRO) with or without conviction
- Fine
- Community Correction Order (CCO)
- Intensive Correction Order (ICO), served in the community with strict conditions
- Full-time imprisonment
Factors that influence the severity of the penalty:
- Whether actual bodily harm or more serious injury was caused
- Whether the conduct occurred during a public disorder
- Whether a weapon was used
- The seriousness of the underlying interaction with police (such as a routine traffic stop versus a serious arrest)
- Whether the conduct was prolonged or a brief, isolated reaction
- Whether alcohol or drug use were a factor (and any rehabilitation evidence)
- Your prior criminal record
- Early plea of guilty and genuine remorse
- Whether the assault police charge was part of “the trifecta” (assault police, resist arrest, offensive language)
For first-time offenders charged with s 60(1) assault police without injury, non-conviction outcomes such as Section 10 dismissals or CROs without conviction are achievable in many cases. ABH offenses against the police often attract custodial sentences, but can be served by way of an ICO. Wounding and GBH offences on police almost always result in full-time imprisonment.
Possible Defences Against Assaulting a Police Officer
Several defences are available for these allegations. Each is assessed on the specific facts of the case.
- The law enforcement member was not acting in the execution of duty. This is the most powerful defence specific to assault police charges. If the officer’s actions were outside lawful authority (for example, an improper detention, an improper search, or use of excessive force), the conduct may not be in the execution of duty, and the charge cannot stand
- Self-defence (section 418 Crimes Act 1900): Where a law enforcement individual used unreasonable force, self-defence may apply. The conduct must be a reasonable response to the threat as you perceived it. Once raised, the prosecution must disprove self-defence beyond a reasonable doubt
- Mistaken identity: You were not the individual involved.
- Lack of intent or recklessness: The contact was accidental, such as flailing during an attempt to escape an improper arrest, rather than directed at the law enforcement individual
- Duress or necessity: You were forced to act by threats from another person, or your conduct was necessary to avoid greater harm
- Identification of the person as a police officer: Where the officer was in plain clothes and did not identify themselves clearly, you may have a defence based on lack of knowledge
- The injury did not meet the legal threshold: For s 60(2) ABH charges, the injury must be more than transient or trifling. For s 60(3) GBH charges, the injury must be a really serious injury. Independent medical evidence can support a downgrade
- Honest and reasonable mistake of fact: A genuine and reasonable belief in a state of facts that, if true, would justify the conduct
Your Options When Charged with Assaulting a Police Officer
When you are charged with this type of offence, you face strategic decisions that shape the outcome
- Negotiate with the prosecution. Where the body-worn footage or evidence shows that the officer’s conduct was problematic, written submissions can lead to the charge being withdrawn, downgraded (for example, from s 60(2) ABH to s 60(1) without injury, or to common assault under s 61), or to amendments to the agreed facts that significantly reduce the seriousness for sentencing
- Plead not guilty and defend the allegation. Where the “execution of duty” element is contestable, where self-defence applies, or where identification is uncertain, contesting the allegation at hearing is often the right approach. Local Court matters are heard before a Judge; District Court matters before a Judge and jury
- Plead guilty and seek the best sentencing outcome. Where guilt is clear or evidence is overwhelming, an early plea attracts a sentencing discount. Strong mitigation material, character references, evidence of rehabilitation, and a frank acknowledgement of the conduct can support a Section 10 dismissal or CRO without conviction for less serious matters
The right choice is a strategic decision that depends on the body-worn footage, the seriousness of the alleged conduct, and your personal circumstances. Pleading guilty without legal advice is particularly risky for assault police charges because the “execution of duty” element so often opens defences that an unrepresented person would not identify.
Our skilled lawyers at The Australian Legal Practice provide clear guidance to assist you through each form of resolution and ensure your interests are protected.
Why Choose The Australian Legal Practice for Assault Police Charges
- Principal-level representation. You deal directly with an experienced senior assault police lawyer Burwood, not a junior or a call centre
- 24/7 availability on (02) 8084 9929. Assault police arrests typically follow incidents that escalate quickly, often outside business hours, and require immediate response
- Three Sydney offices: Burwood (next to Burwood Local Court), Sydney CBD (Chifley Tower), and Parramatta (next to Parramatta Local Court)
- Initial consultation so you can assess your defence options before your first court date
- Fixed-fee arrangements available for standard s 60(1) assault police matters
- Strong record on “execution of duty” challenges, including cases where unlawful arrests led to charge withdrawals
- Trial advocacy experience in District Court for serious aggravated assault on police matters
- Integrated advice on associated charges in “the trifecta” — resist arrest, offensive language, and assault police
ONLINE ENQUIRY
Make a booking to arrange a free consult today.
Call A Lawyer NOw
AVAILABLE 24/7
Frequently Asked Questions About Assaulting a Police Officer
The member involved must be acting within their lawful authority at the time of the alleged assault. If the law enforcement individual was conducting an unlawful arrest, exceeding their powers, or using excessive force, they may not be in the execution of duty. This element must be proved by the prosecution beyond reasonable doubt and is the most common ground for challenging an assault police charge.
Yes. Self-defence under section 418 of the Crimes Act 1900 (NSW) is available for assault police allegations. If the police used unreasonable force, you are entitled to use reasonable force to defend yourself. Once self-defence is raised, the prosecution must disprove it beyond reasonable doubt.
Aggravated assault on a police officer refers to the more serious offences in section 60, including ABH on police (s 60(2), 7 years), wounding or GBH (s 60(3), 12 years), and any of these offences committed during a public disorder, which add 2 additional years to the maximum penalty.
It depends on the specific charge and circumstances. Section 60(1) assault police without injury can resolve with a Section 10 dismissal or CRO without conviction for first-time offenders with strong mitigation. Section 60(2) ABH offences often attract custodial sentences but can be served as ICOs. Section 60(3) wounding or GBH offences almost always result in full-time imprisonment.
“The trifecta” refers to three charges that often come together when a person resists arrest: assault police (section 60), resist arrest (section 546C), and offensive language (under the Summary Offences Act 1988). Each charge carries its own penalty, but they are commonly negotiated as a package, particularly where the body-worn video shows escalation on both sides.
